A federal judge has issued an injunction against a new Florida law that sought to impose stricter financial disclosure requirements on local officials. The ruling marks a notable setback for state lawmakers who advocated for heightened transparency in public office.
The contested legislation, which aimed to enforce more comprehensive financial disclosures from local elected officials, was challenged on grounds of constitutionality and privacy infringement. The plaintiffs argued that the law’s requirements were excessively burdensome and intrusive, potentially deterring qualified individuals from seeking public office.
Judge Melissa Damian of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida sided with the plaintiffs, granting a preliminary injunction to halt the implementation of the law. In his ruling, Judge Damian emphasized that the plaintiffs demonstrated a substantial likelihood of success on the merits of their constitutional claims. She highlighted concerns that the law could violate the First and Fourteenth Amendments by imposing undue burdens on local officials’ privacy rights.
The blocked law, which was set to take effect on July 1, mandated that local officials disclose a wide range of financial information, including assets, liabilities, income sources, and business interests.
“(The state has) not demonstrated a relationship between the interest of protecting against the abuse of the public trust and SB 774’s fulsome financial disclosure requirements, and history does not support or justify the need for requiring municipal elected officials and candidates to comply with the Form 6 requirements when Form 1, a less intrusive method, is available and has not been shown to be ineffective or inadequate,” Damian wrote.
Opponents, however, contended that the law’s scope was overly broad and posed significant risks to personal privacy. They also pointed out that Florida already has robust financial disclosure requirements in place for local officials.
