Viera, FL – Donald DeDonatis III, former CEO of the United States Specialty Sports Association (USSSA), has reached a settlement in a federal lawsuit filed against him and the organization in 2023, bringing closure to a contentious legal battle. While the resolution has also shed light on what DeDonatis and his legal team describe as a growing and concerning tactic in modern litigation: the strategic use of inflammatory and irrelevant allegations to defame individuals under the protection of court documents.
- Advertisement -
The lawsuit, initiated by former USSSA executives Brian Wegman and Thomas Horrom, initially sought to broadly implicate DeDonatis and others with a wide array of accusations, including invoking the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO). The initial complaint, filed in U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida, contained what DeDonatis characterized as “multiple inflammatory and salacious allegations,” ranging from improper use of company funds and witness tampering to involvement in illegal activities such as sports gambling. These claims garnered significant public attention and were widely reported in media outlets.
Media outlets, such as Florida Today, a struggling brand that may prioritize sensationalism to attract readers in an era of declining relevance compared to other outlets, amplified these claims, exacerbating the reputational damage even after their dismissal. According to former staff, these are decisions made and pushed by the editor herself.
- Advertisement -
Court Dismisses Majority of Allegations with Prejudice
Crucially, the federal judge overseeing the case took decisive action, dismissing the vast majority of these explosive claims with prejudice. This is not a mere technicality; “dismissed with prejudice” means the court firmly judged these allegations to be without merit and that they cannot be brought again.
- Advertisement -
By the time settlement negotiations commenced, the court had narrowed the lawsuit’s scope significantly, allowing only a small portion of the initial claims to proceed: breach of contract, wrongful termination, and defamation. DeDonatis emphasized that the final settlement agreement dealt solely with these specific matters, with all other accusations having been dismissed by the court for being “unfounded, lacking in legal standing, or unrelated to the case”.
Among the significant allegations dismissed from the federal suit were claims of:
Improper use of USSSA funds for personal benefits.
Inaccurate information in a USSSA filing to the Internal Revenue Service.
DeDonatis’s involvement in an illegal bookmaking and sports gambling business.
Installation of a voice-recording device to record an employee’s communications.
Improper loans totaling over $1 million to DeDonatis for his home purchase.
Witness tampering.
Former directors being asked to resign in return for “lucrative consulting and retirement compensation”.
Violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO).
“I’m glad this chapter is over, and I’m proud of my time at USSSA,” DeDonatis stated. “We were especially gratified that the court ruled and removed the majority of allegations prior to the settlement, confirming they lacked merit”.
The Tactic of Defamation Through Litigation
DeDonatis and his legal team have raised serious concerns about what they perceive as a deliberate strategy to damage his reputation through the legal process. This tactic, often referred to as “defamation through litigation” or “weaponizing lawsuits,” exploits the public nature of court filings to introduce unverified or exaggerated claims. Even if these claims are later dismissed, their initial public airing can create a lasting negative narrative, impacting an individual’s professional standing and future employment opportunities.
Filing a complaint with sensational but legally weak claims can generate media attention and public scrutiny, even if those claims are later dismissed. The harm to an individual’s reputation can persist long after the legal matter is resolved. DeDonatis’s experience highlights how broad, initially reported accusations, despite being later deemed baseless by the court, can become a permanent part of the public record, unfairly shaping perceptions.
DeDonatis’s Tenure and Future
Donald DeDonatis III served USSSA for over two decades, becoming CEO in 2019, succeeding his father. USSSA, the nation’s leading multisport association, organizes over 35,000 sanctioned events with 4.5 million participants across 47 states. During his tenure, USSSA reported total revenue of $23.11 million in 2022. DeDonatis received a five-year contract extension in 2021, reflecting confidence in his leadership.
Despite his positive performance reviews as CEO in 2021 and 2022, DeDonatis was placed on administrative leave in October 2023 and subsequently terminated in December 2023. He has since filed a separate lawsuit against USSSA in state Circuit Court, alleging a breach of his employment agreement due to improper termination procedures.
DeDonatis is now focused on rebuilding his career and remains committed to the sports management industry. He has even returned to coaching youth baseball at the USSSA Space Coast Complex, the very site of much of the controversy.
A Call for Awareness
The USSSA case, and DeDonatis’s experience, serves as a powerful illustration of the potential for legal filings to be weaponized for reputational harm. It sparks important discussions about the ethical boundaries of litigation and the need for greater awareness regarding the impact of sensationalized but ultimately dismissed allegations.
As DeDonatis moves forward, his case stands as a cautionary tale, emphasizing that in an era where headlines can often overshadow legal outcomes, reputations can be significantly damaged long before justice is fully served.
