Published on
Today on Truth Social, President Donald J. Trump announced that the Republican Party intends to eliminate Daylight Saving Time (DST), calling it “inconvenient and very costly to our Nation.” The post has reignited national debate about the twice-annual time change, sparking discussions about its origins, impact, and what it would take to do away with the practice altogether.
Daylight Saving Time was first implemented in the United States during World War I as a way to conserve fuel and energy by maximizing daylight hours. The practice was standardized nationwide with the Uniform Time Act of 1966, though states were given the option to opt-out. Today, Hawaii and most of Arizona, as well as U.S. territories like Puerto Rico and Guam, do not observe DST.
The idea has long been controversial. While proponents argue it saves energy and encourages outdoor activity during extended daylight, critics say its benefits are negligible in the modern era and that the disruptions to sleep and productivity are more harmful than helpful.
The call to end DST aligns with growing public sentiment. A 2022 survey by the Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research found that nearly 60% of Americans want to eliminate the biannual clock changes. Supporters of abolishing DST argue that it can disrupt sleep patterns, lead to health issues, and cause workplace inefficiency. Additionally, studies have shown an increase in heart attacks and traffic accidents following the springtime shift.
On the other hand, some businesses, particularly those in the retail and tourism industries, benefit from the extended daylight hours, which encourage consumer spending and leisure activities. Farmers, traditionally thought to favor DST, often oppose it, as the shifting clock disrupts their schedules and livestock routines.
To abolish DST nationwide, Congress would need to pass legislation repealing the Uniform Time Act or revising it to mandate permanent standard time or permanent daylight saving time. This is not without precedent. In 2022, the U.S. Senate unanimously passed the Sunshine Protection Act, which would make DST permanent year-round. However, the bill stalled in the House of Representatives due to disagreements over the effects of permanent DST versus permanent standard time.
State legislatures also play a role. Many states have passed laws or resolutions supporting the move to permanent DST, but these measures require federal approval to take effect.
If Trump’s vision becomes reality, Americans would no longer have to reset their clocks twice a year, potentially avoiding the health and productivity losses associated with the practice. However, questions remain about whether the country would adopt permanent standard time, favored by health experts for better alignment with circadian rhythms, or permanent DST, which offers extended evening daylight.
The change would also have implications for industries and institutions accustomed to the time shifts, from financial markets to schools and public transportation. Global synchronization might become more complicated, as many countries still observe DST.
Trump’s statement has undoubtedly put the spotlight back on Daylight Saving Time, and the topic is likely to become a talking point in upcoming legislative sessions and political campaigns. Whether the GOP can successfully champion this change remains to be seen, but the conversation underscores a broader national frustration with the century-old practice.
For now, Americans will continue to adjust their clocks as the debate over DST’s future marches on.